Ra3 4xlarge pricing1/6/2024 ![]() ![]() The Redshift Serverless endpoint (USE1-ServerlessUsage) costs have eclipsed the costs of our reserved cluster. If the calculated price profile is favorable consider reserving nodes. A good experiment would be to add an on-demand node to the cluster and observe the reduction in Concurrency Scaling and overall cluster CPU. A cost effective solution here is to offset the on-demand pricing with reserved instances. ![]() First off, let’s acknowledge how cool this is - we are running a cluster at or above the redline and still completing the necessary work and serving our end users. This cluster is obviously blowing through the daily budget, and relying heavily on on-demand capacity to complete its computing tasks. Our Concurrency Scaling (CS:ra3.4xlarge) is approaching the cost of our reserved cluster. USE-DataScanned - Redshift spectrum usage, querying data that exists in S3 or other external sourcesįor context we are looking at 3 pieces of Redshift infrastructure: a reserved ra3.4xlarge cluster, an on-demand ra3.xlplus cluster, and a Redshift Serverless endpoint. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |